A builder has been imprisoned for 24 weeks after he failed to report a serious incident at a construction site he was in charge of.
The Court heard that on January 2019, the IP had been clearing a site with an excavator so a new house could be built. The excavator tipped while digging and it trapped the IP’s leg, resulting in an amputation.
An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the IP had no formal training for operating excavators and had requested a 3-ton model was provided for the work. However, only a smaller 1.7-ton excavator was provided, and the IP was put under pressure to use this.
The incident was not reported to the HSE within ten days as required and the defendant had not investigated the incident. HSE was only able to start an investigation more than eight months later when the victim complained. By this time crucial evidence relating to the cause of the incident was unobtainable and the work was almost completed.
There was no health and safety related documentation and there was no employer’s insurance cover for the IP to claim against. The defendant had not obtained any health and safety related training during his 50 years in the construction industry.
The defendant, pleaded guilty to a breach of Regulation 3(1) of the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013. He received a 24-week custodial sentence and was ordered to pay costs of £2,033.
Speaking after the hearing, An HSE inspector said: “This case re-enforces how important it is that incidents are reported so they can be investigated, and improvements made to prevent serious incidents in future.
The judge noted the defendant had not reported the incident even when prompted to by a solicitor, and that despite his construction experience he had failed to take any interest in understanding his legal duties nor invest in health and safety.
“The defendant claimed in court that he had stopped working for months due to the impact of the incident. However, the evidence showed he had continued with the work.
“The judge commented on how distressing it must have been for the IP on top of his life changing injury, to know the incident was not being investigated.”
He added: “We went to great efforts to ensure the defendant made improvements. However, in court it was confirmed that although he had told the probation officer, he had stopped work, he was still carrying out construction work at an unidentified site despite failing a health and safety test.”